Dec. 6, 2007 – 4:27 p.m.
Prerecorded calls offering negative information about every Republican presidential hopeful except former Arkansas Gov.
The House Administration Subcommittee on Elections is considering whether political dial-a-voter messages ought to abide by the same “do not call” list limits as commercial telemarketers. Lawmakers are concerned that some groups are using the calls to deliberately mislead voters and that the abuse could depress voter turnout.
A spokesman for
During a hearing Thursday, Lofgren said a Pew Internet and American Life Project report indicated that roughly two-thirds of Americans received the prerecorded calls during the weeks preceding last year’s election.
Rep.
Bean, who won a second term with just 50.9 percent of the vote, said the calls were designed to leave the impression that they were sponsored by her supporters and not the NRCC.
The message began with a recorded voice stating that the call contained information about
“They would describe how the calls woke up their babies, interrupted their dinner, kept leaving them messages on their cell phones that were received late at night or forced them to run to grab the phone, and all they would hear is ‘Hello, I am calling with information about
Other automated calls became a point of contention this week in Iowa, where Huckabee denounced the group, Common Sense Issues — founded by some of his supporters — for launching a string of prerecorded calls bashing other Republican candidates and promoting Huckabee.
If Lofgren decides to add the do-not-call language to her bill, she could model it after legislation that already has been introduced by Pennsylvania Democrat
Both have introduced bills (
The legislation “does not prohibit automated phone calls, but it gives Americans the right to choose not to receive them, just as they would any other solicitation,” Altmire said. “Why should political campaigns be specifically carved out from the do-not-call list when businesses across the country are required to abide by it?”
Democratic and Republican lawmakers said they wanted a balance between protecting residential privacy and protecting free speech. “There are some First Amendment issues here, there is no doubt about it,” Lofgren said.
On June 25, the House passed a broader bill that would punish anyone who attempts to deceive or intimidate voters. The legislation (


