July 25, 2008 – Updated 4:22 p.m.
Appearing at an acrimonious committee hearing spurred by his efforts to begin a House impeachment inquiry, Ohio Democratic Rep.
“The war was totally unnecessary, unprovoked and unjustified,” said Kucinich. “The question for Congress is this: What responsibility do the president and members of his administration have for that unnecessary, unprovoked and unjustified war? The rules of the House prevent me or any witness from utilizing familiar terms. But we can put two and two together in our minds. We can draw inferences about culpability.”
Committee members were sharply divided along party lines about whether impeachment proceedings should begin against Bush, who has a little less than six months left in office. Several Democrats clearly favored beginning actual impeachment proceedings. Republicans, on the other hand, cast the hearing as a misguided, politically motivated attack on Bush.
Demands for Bush’s impeachment and removal from office by administration critics — who accuse the president of flouting the Constitution by taking the country to war in Iraq under false pretenses and conducting warrantless surveillance of U.S. citizens, among other issues — have grown steadily in recent years. But the House will not actually move to impeach Bush. Democratic congressional leaders, fearing a potential voter backlash at the polls, foreswore any impeachment efforts after regaining a House majority in the 2006 elections.
In any event, there is little time left for a full-blown Judiciary Committee impeachment inquiry, let alone action by the full House, or a Senate trial. Then too, it is unclear at best that a majority of the House would vote to impeach the president, and it is virtually certain that there would not be the support of two-thirds of those present and voting in the Senate for conviction.
But those realities did not inhibit impassioned rhetoric on both sides of the issue Friday. Rep.
The House voted 238-180 on July 16 to send the latest in a series of Kucinich impeachment resolutions (
Friday’s hearing, billed as an examination of “Executive Power and Its Constitutional Limitations,” was not explicitly an impeachment hearing, a fact that committee Chairman
“We do not intend to go away until we achieve the accountability that the Congress is entitled to and the American people deserve,” Conyers said.
But it is not clear whether Kucinich – who has said he would file articles of impeachment in the House every month until there was an impeachment hearing – will go away either.
Committee Republicans were quick to label the hearing an impeachment proceeding, and to attack Democrats for staging it.
The line of spectators vying for seats in the hearing room stretched far down the hall outside before the start of the hearing.
Kucinich entered to applause from the crowd outside and in the hearing room. At various points, the crowd outside chanted, “Shame” and “We want in.”
Testifying before the committee, Rep.
The audience interrupted the hearing several times with applause or comments. Conyers ordered anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan to leave the hearing after she stood up and said “I urge [the committee] to take action.”
Late in the hearing,
He threw his button toward Lungren as he was escorted from the hearing room.
Kucinich declined to say whether or not he’ll keep putting resolutions on the floor, but hopes the Judiciary Committee will launch an 11th-hour impeachment inquiry, despite the obvious reluctance of Democratic leadership to do so.
Kucinich said that after “a six-hour hearing on abuse of executive power,” the question is “whether the Judiciary Committee wants to take that up.”
First posted July 25, 2008 10:13 a.m.


