CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS – DEFENSE
Updated June 22, 2011 – 4:22 p.m.
House Moves Toward Rebuke Over Libya as Senate Delays Debate
By Alan K. Ota and Brian Friel, CQ Staff
House Republicans are deeply divided over whether Congress should authorize the Libya mission, but prospects are rising for a strong rebuke of the Obama administration’s handling of the operation.
The House delayed votes originally scheduled for Thursday on two resolutions related to the U.S. role in the NATO-led operation in Libya. The votes could now take place as early as Friday.
One of the resolutions echoes a Senate measure that would authorize the operation, but Speaker
Instead, Republican leaders decided to strengthen a second draft measure aimed at limiting U.S. participation in the Libya operation. They added a provision to block current funding for all aspects of the mission except “non-hostile actions,” such as search and rescue, aerial refueling, operational planning and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance activities to support NATO.
Armed Services Chairman
McKeon said he supported the funding limitation measure, and predicted it would win broad, bipartisan support.
But several Republicans said there was concern among many other GOP lawmakers who want a chance to vote on a proposal to shut off funding for much if not all of the support activities for NATO intervention. “A lot of members are not happy with the choices,” said
Republican Rep.
“The only power we have in this area is the power of the purse,” Lungren said.
The tougher measure is drawing support from conservative Republicans leery of Obama and worried about the cost of military action as well as liberal Democrats opposed to military action.
Many Republicans — and a number of Democrats — have been angered by what they say is the White House’s failure to adequately consult Congress before launching the operation or in the more than three months since bombs started falling.
“Operationally, we don’t think the president should be in Libya until he’s defined it better,” Rep.
Rep.
House Moves Toward Rebuke Over Libya as Senate Delays Debate
“There seem to be a lot of people who want limitations,” he said.
‘Political Football’
Obama administration officials blasted the House developments as politically motivated.
“I think, astoundingly, there is a move in the House of Representatives to take an effort as it relates to the ongoing effort to stop a tyrant in Libya and to turn it into a political football in such a way here as to give, at a critical time — potentially send a very negative signal to the leadership of that country, which, as we all know, has over the course of time carried out hateful and heinous attacks against U.S. citizens, including terrorist attacks,” a senior administration official told reporters Wednesday.
Boehner said he largely backs the Senate approach to authorize the U.S. involvement Libya while acknowledging that the House lacks the support to approve such a resolution.
“The fact is the president has not made his case to members of Congress, has not made his case to the American people,” Boehner said Wednesday. He urged Obama to present a stronger case for the U.S. role in Libya.
A senior House Republican said he doubted leaders would bring to the floor legislation that would disrupt the Libya mission.
On the Democratic side, Rep.
“The second resolution will not end the war immediately, but it will prohibit the administration from expanding U.S. involvement in the war,” he wrote.
Rep.
“I think people are just angry about the way they’re being treated by the administration,” he said Wednesday. “It’s an institutional issue and a constitutional issue as well as a policy issue and the president’s made it that way.”
But Sen.
“This is not going to happen. It is never going to become law,” Graham said. “I can understand why people in the House are very upset with the president. . . . But I don’t want to do anything that would give Qaddafi hope.”
House Moves Toward Rebuke Over Libya as Senate Delays Debate
Different Currents
The Senate, for its part, will likely debate a resolution authorizing U.S. military involvement in Libya after the Fourth of July recess, a Senate leadership aide said Wednesday.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is expected to mark up a resolution next week that is generally supportive of President Obama’s decision to participate in the NATO-led operations in Libya. It is sponsored by Foreign Relations Chairman
With the Senate on recess the following week, floor debate and a vote on that measure and other resolutions more critical of the president’s action would take place the week of July 11 at the earliest.
The decision to punt Senate action until after the Fourth of July comes a day after senators announced they would soon take a stand on Libya.
The bipartisan Kerry-McCain measure (
Majority Leader
Minority Leader
“When
McConnell also suggested that some Republicans may be more vocal in their opposition to the Libya operation because it was undertaken by a Democratic president.
“I’m not sure that these kinds of differences might not have been there in a more latent form when you had a Republican president, but I do think there is more of a tendency to pull together when the guy in the White House is on your side,” McConnell said. “Some of these views were probably held by some of my members in the previous administration but party loyalty tended to kind of mute them. A lot of our members, not having a Republican in the White House, feel more free to express their reservations.”
McConnell also noted the wide range of opinions on the Libya operations among Senate Republicans, noting that some Republicans are opposed on constitutional grounds and others on budgetary grounds.
“There’s pretty broad agreement now that the Senate needs to have a debate on Libya,” McConnell said. “The Senate is going to have a debate and is going to vote on something, and presumably that would relate to getting some kind of presidential approval of some sort.”
House Moves Toward Rebuke Over Libya as Senate Delays Debate
Emily Cadei contributed to this story.
First posted June 22, 2011 11:37 a.m.