CQ

CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS – EMPLOYMENT & LABOR
Dec. 1, 2011 – 5:04 p.m.

Republicans Debate Plan for Renewing Long-Term Jobless Benefits

By David Harrison, CQ Staff

Outlines of a possible GOP proposal to preserve benefits for the long-term unemployed are beginning to take shape as the House Republican Conference prepares for a closed-door meeting Friday to devise a strategy for handling jobless aid and other legislation awaiting action before year’s end.

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., said Thursday that a group of Republicans from both chambers has been discussing with party leaders a plan to renew these benefits, which will expire beginning early next year. The renewal plan depends on several conditions, DeMint said. The cost must be offset, and the renewal must incorporate both an overhaul of unemployment insurance programs and provisions that would create jobs, he said.

DeMint’s position can be seen as an opening bid by some Senate and House conservatives as negotiations accelerate over continuing the long-term benefits. Such Democrats as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland have insisted that extending unemployment benefits should not be pared with offsetting spending cuts because the benefits will be phased out once the economy recovers.

Although House and Senate leaders in both parties insist that benefits for workers who have been jobless for long periods will be extended before the end of the year, Democrats and Republicans must resolve considerable differences in their approaches as they face an increasingly crowded legislative agenda and little time as Congress tries to wrap up its work in just a few weeks.

“What we hope to do is try to turn this into a jobs plan in effect, where we have something that first of all pays for the extension, that reforms the program in some way but also adds a job component that will increase jobs, not just increase unemployment,” DeMint said. “We’re looking for a way to extend it, but only if we’re improving the jobs situation, not making it worse.”

Asked what that “job component” might look like, DeMint suggested “opening up energy,” an indication that Republicans may try to authorize an expansion of oil and natural gas drilling to any legislative vehicle that renews jobless benefits.

Earlier this month, House Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, floated the idea of opening more land to drilling as a way to offset the cost of a surface transportation reauthorization bill. It remains to be seen how closely the plan Boehner and other House Republican leaders put together will resemble the option favored by DeMint.

Linking Aid to GOP Jobs Bills

In 2008 and 2009, Congress approved programs of jobless benefits financed by the federal government that take effect after workers have exhausted their state-paid unemployment coverage, which typically lasts 28 weeks. The long-term federal aid was intended to be temporary, but the persistently weak economy has led lawmakers to extend the programs multiple times.

The current extension is due to run out in the first few days of January, which would cut off aid to 6 million unemployed people over the course of 2012. If Congress does not renew the benefits, advocates say, the loss of money for the economy will imperil the recovery. A one-year extension would cost roughly $50 billion.

House Republicans are likely to combine into a single bill the renewal of jobless benefits, an extension of the temporary Social Security payroll tax cut enacted last December and other measures.

On Thursday, Boehner said the package might incorporate some of the roughly 21 House-passed bills that Republicans say would create jobs but that are unlikely to move in the Democratic Senate. Many of those bills would roll back federal regulations and expand energy production. It is a strategy that is unlikely to be acceptable to Democrats.

“There clearly are some of those jobs bills and other ideas that we have that we think would help create more employment opportunity in America,” Boehner said. “That may be considered here.”

Republicans Debate Plan for Renewing Long-Term Jobless Benefits

Many Republicans, including party leaders, have said they want the unemployment insurance system to be overhauled, possibly to resemble pilot programs in Georgia and North Carolina that allow jobless people to volunteer with companies while collecting benefits in the hope of eventually landing a permanent position.

President Obama included changes along those lines in his jobs package earlier this fall. But it might be difficult to iron out the details of changes to the program before Congress wraps up its work for the year.

Currently, the unemployed are eligible for up to 99 weeks of benefits, when state and federal assistance are combined. Many conservatives say that is too long a period of aid and offers little incentive for unemployed people to seek jobs.

“If there’s no reform in this system, I think it’s a bad idea to continue to pay people for two years to not work,” said Rep. James Lankford, R-Okla. “There’s got to be some incentive to go get skills training.”

Lankford said many conservatives are willing to stay in session as long as it takes to make changes to the program. That might spell trouble for House leaders who devoted a Wednesday morning conference meeting to trying to persuade members to back a quick extension of jobless benefits.

“They’re saying, you know we have to get something done. We’re saying, we understand that, but we’ve got to get it right,” Lankford said.

Democrats, meanwhile, are pressing for renewal of the long-term aid, backed by left-leaning advocacy groups and labor unions. The National Employment Law Project delivered a petition to Congress this week signed by 75,000 people, and the AFL-CIO is planning several rallies next week.

“There is no more important piece of legislation than the extension of the unemployment insurance benefits for our people,” Hoyer said. “Over the next 21 days, we’re going to test whether the Congress has a heart and a soul.”

Rep. Sander M. Levin of Michigan, ranking Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee, said Republican and Democratic staffers have been holding preliminary discussions about ways to finance a renewal of benefits. He said he hoped the discussions will soon include lawmakers.

Although Democratic leaders say a renewal should not be offset, Levin struck a more conciliatory tone, saying he would be willing to consider matching spending cuts. A longstanding champion of unemployment benefits, the Michigan lawmaker said the priority for him was to see the aid continue.

“My basic position is it has to happen one way or another,” Levin said.

© Congressional Quarterly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
77 K Street N.E. | Washington, D.C. 20002-4681 | 202-650-6500
  • About CQ-Roll Call Group
  • Privacy Policy
  • Masthead
  • Terms & Conditions
Back to the Top