CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
Updated March 27, 2012 – 5:36 p.m.
Highway Extension Bill Stalls Again
By Nathan Hurst, CQ Staff
Another effort by House Republican leaders to pass a short-term extension of surface transportation programs was thwarted Tuesday, as members of both parties continue to fight for leverage on policy and funding issues.
The setback — the second in as many days — increases the stakes for Speaker
Republicans pushed for a House vote on a 60-day extension (
Majority Leader
Boehner, R-Ohio, and his leadership team appear to have no clear path to passing the Speaker’s ambitious overhaul of transportation projects and are struggling to win support for a short-term extension before the current one (PL 112-30) expires March 31.
Democrats showed no signs of blinking, repeating calls for the House to vote on that chamber’s version (
Without an agreement between House and Senate leaders, Democrats are reluctant to vote for a short-term bill that would give House Republicans more time to complete work on their own five-year, $260 billion proposal (
Further complicating the situation for Republicans, however, are conservatives in their own conference, who are facing increased pressure from outside groups, such as the conservative Heritage Action for America, which earlier this week pressed them to turn over responsibility for maintaining the nation’s infrastructure to each state, essentially ending the federal government’s role in building and maintaining a federal highway system.
Michael Needham, the group’s chief executive, is no fan of a short-term extension but said if one must be passed, “Congress should use the brief reprieve to do transportation policy right.”
And from the moderate side of the Republican ranks, a small group —
Michael Steel, a Boehner spokesman, said Democrats were standing in the way. “There is only one reason this bill will not be voted on tonight: House Democrats are playing political games with our nation’s economy,” he said.
Confusion Over Agreements
House Republicans are reaching out to Democrats in an effort to reach an agreement that would allow a vote on a short-term extension Wednesday, a senior Republican aide said, adding that the vote could happen Thursday.
Highway Extension Bill Stalls Again
Staff-level negotiations between Boehner’s office and aides to Senate Majority Leader
A senior Senate Democratic aide said no final agreement was reached in the staff-level talks that produced what he said was an exchange of suggestions by Democratic senators and updates from Boehner aides about the Speaker’s plans.
He said Boehner’s team suggested a stand-alone 90-day extension and an extension tied to a so-called shell bill with a tax title that could be used as a vehicle for conference negotiations, before settling on a stand-alone 60-day extension.
“We heard three stories from them. It kept changing,” the Senate Democratic aide said.
When Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman
“There was a bipartisan agreement between the leadership of the House and the Senate to move forward because we have to get people to work,” Mica said.
Shuster added: “I thought it was bipartisan agreement; I guess we’ll find out shortly.”
But Rep.
Rahall asserted there was no consultation with House Democrats on the extension before it was brought to the floor.
Tuesday’s developments appeared to buoy Democrats in their push to get the House to vote on the Senate-passed bill.
Senate Environment and Public Works Chairwoman
Reid also continued Tuesday to encourage House leaders to bring the Senate measure to a vote, but he did not rule out accepting a stopgap bill from the House.
“My feelings haven’t changed,” he said. “I don’t like the extension.”
Highway Extension Bill Stalls Again
Industry lobbyists who have been working with both chambers to pass a highway bill said it was important to get the length of an extension right. Lawmakers need enough time to reach a long-term deal, but an extension that is too long could end up punting the issue closer to — or even past — the November elections.
R. Bruce Josten, the top lobbyist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, wrote in a letter circulated Tuesday that “no length of extension” would be “adequate” but that it was important for the chambers to complete work soon on “a multi-year bill with much-needed policy reforms and funding certainty.”
Niels Lesniewski, Alan K. Ota, Emily Holden and Anne L. Kim contributed to this story.
First posted March 27, 2012 2:29 p.m.