CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS – LEGAL AFFAIRS
May 14, 2012 – 7:41 p.m.
Benefits for Federal Workers’ Domestic Partners Addressed in Senate Bill
By John Gramlich, CQ Staff
A week after President Obama announced his support for same-sex marriage, a Senate panel will on Wednesday take up legislation that would extend benefits to the domestic partners of federal employees.
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman
This year — Lieberman’s last in the Senate — the committee will “probably” approve the bill again, said Leslie Phillips, a panel spokeswoman. The bill has 22 cosponsors, including Maine Republican
Senate Majority Leader
“I’ll be pushing for it to come up because I view it as not only as a matter of equity [and] fairness, but also as one of the best things we can do to attract the best people into federal service,” Lieberman said.
The legislation would make the same-sex domestic partners of federal workers eligible for a variety of benefits they currently do not receive, including health insurance, long-term care and retirement and cover them under provisions of the Family and Medical Leave Act (PL 103-3).
The bill is intended to build on an executive order issued by Obama in 2010 that expanded some, but not all, benefits for same-sex domestic partners in the federal workforce. Obama’s executive order came after he directed federal agencies to determine which benefits could be extended without congressional action.
The administration has not formally weighed in on Lieberman’s bill this year, but Obama made clear in his 2010 executive order that he supports efforts to provide full federal benefits to domestic partners.
“For far too long, many of our government’s hard-working, dedicated LGBT employees have been denied equal access to the basic rights and benefits their colleagues enjoy,” Obama wrote two years ago, referring to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender workers. “This kind of systemic inequality undermines the health, well-being and security not just of our federal workforce, but also of their families and communities.”
Political Momentum
Supporters of the measure are hoping to tap into political momentum sparked by both Obama’s recent position on gay marriage and an announcement by Reid that he would try to bring to the Senate floor a measure (
“This legislation is on the right side of history. It is simply an affirmation of something we all believe in — equal pay for equal work, which also means equal benefits,” Lieberman said in a written statement.
Lieberman’s bill does not address the question of gay marriage itself but could benefit from broader attention on gay rights legislation, backers say. “It bolsters the image of this bill and the attention that will be paid to it,” said Bradley Jacklin, project director in public policy and government affairs for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
Benefits for Federal Workers’ Domestic Partners Addressed in Senate Bill
Phillips, the committee spokeswoman, said the markup was not specifically scheduled to capitalize on the president’s endorsement of same-sex marriage. “I wish we had been so clever, but the domestic partners bill simply happened to be ready to go,” she said in an e-mail.
It’s an open question whether moderate Republicans besides Collins will support the bill. In the past, there have been concerns over its costs, particularly the extension of health care benefits to same-sex partners.
Private-Sector Comparisons
The legislation is supported by 35 organizations, including some of the nation’s largest labor unions. In March, the groups sent a letter to senators urging them to push for passage, noting that many private-sector firms and state and local governments already offer workplace benefits to same-sex domestic partners.
Sixty percent of Fortune 500 companies now offer benefits for domestic partners, the letter said, singling out the Big Three automakers, United Airlines and American Airlines, Raytheon, IBM and Alcoa, as well as other firms.
Twenty-four states, the District of Columbia and more than 150 local governments also provide benefits to domestic partners, the groups said, adding that some “quasi-federal agencies,” such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Reserve, do as well.
Collins has framed the issue as a matter of brain drain, with the federal government potentially losing qualified workers because of its benefit practices.
“This change is both fair policy and good business practice,” she said in a written statement in March. “The federal government must compete with the private sector when it comes to attracting the most qualified, skilled and dedicated employees. Today, health, medical and other benefits are a major component of any competitive employment package.”